WPL Week 4 Match Reports

Welcome to the Week 4 Match Reports by YSC Interns and YSC Guest bloggers! Thanks again for the match reports and keep up the good work everyone. I am still waiting for two match reports but will update as soon as I receive them.

Washington DC Furies vs Keystone
By: Margaret McElligott

On a windy day on their home pitch, the Washington Furies nearly upset Keystone, but dropped the close match, 24-19. They did not trail until the final five minutes of the game.

The wind’s impact was apparent from the start, with Keystone kicking into a strong headwind. The teams traded lineouts and the first scrum of the match made clear that Keystone’s pack vastly outweighed the Furies, who made quick adjustments to account for the difference.

The Furies pressed deeper into Keystone territory, helped by four early penalties on the visitors. A smart decision by Keystone to call fair catch inside the 22 gave the team an opportunity to clear the ball, but the Furies brought it back down. Flyhalf Mere Baker used a deceptive fake on the left side in the 13th minute to flash between Keystone defenders and dish to outside center Beth Noto for the first try of the match. Fullback Emily Miller made the conversion to give the Furies an early 7-0 lead.

Keystone responded with a furious, pounding attack into Furies territory, using packs of large-bodied forwards to advance the ball and punish the Furies’ defense. Two penalties on the Furies pushed them back even further, but Keystone was called for holding on inside the 5-meter line, giving the Furies a little more breathing room. In the 25th minute, Keystone flyhalf Ines Rodriguez found a gap in the Furies’ defense, darting through space and finally offloading to flanker Alison Worman for the un-touched try. The conversion was no good, with wind a constant problem, and the Furies maintained a precious 7-5 lead.

And soon the lead would grow. The Furies struck back within three minutes, when Baker created a hole up the right side and Miller touched the ball down for a try in the far-right corner of the try zone. The conversion was no good, bringing the score to 12-5.

Keystone pounded the ball back down to a scrum at the Furies five-meter line, but the Furies defense held. In the 35th minute, Keystone poached the ball off a Furies scrum and Devon Boyle got the try up the left side. Ines Rodriguez made the conversion, bringing the match to a 12-12 tie.

The Furies would get one more good look before the half, but Baker’s looping kick to the far right side of the try zone bounced out the end before the pursuing backs could chase it down.

Keystone took advantage of the wind at the start of the second half, sending their kicks sailing into Furies territory, but sloppy play by the backs – dropped passes and knock ons – gave the Furies the opportunity to clear the ball. The Furies kept up the pressure, tackling Keystone players behind the gain line and forcing them into errors. Starting with a kick by lock Liz Hirschhorn, the Furies moved the ball downfield with team support and would be first to strike in the second half. In the 54th minute, Noto broke free to score the try and Miller made the conversion to put the Furies out in front again, 19-12.

Keystone responded. The visitors moved the ball for the long series of phases at the try line and were held up in the try zone. In the 65th minute, Farrah Douglas scored on the right side off the scrum, but Keystone missed the conversion and trailed the Furies, 19-17, with 15 minutes left in the match.

The closing minutes were fast and furious. A brilliant kick by Keystone rolled into touch just outside the Furies’ try line. The Furies successfully defended twice before Keystone’s Kim Magrini scored off the back of the scrum in the 76th minute, putting her team ahead for the first time that day. Rodriguez kicked the conversion and Keystone led, 24-19.

It was all they would need. The Furies pushed hard in the final minutes, but Keystone’s defense held for the win.

“We definitely played more aggressively, but I think the biggest difference was that we started to believe as a team that we could play at that level,” Furies head coach Nancy Fitz said. “I think that we’ve definitely turned a corner…People started to believe that, yeah, I can beat that person and we can beat that team. And from an execution point of view, we made fewer mistakes and we did a better job capitalizing on theirs.”

Keystone vs DC Furies
By: Ashley Nesby

Keystone won its game against the Furies. But it wasn’t pretty. The intense wind caused many errant passes and mishandling of the ball. As was expected, and has been shown in their previous matches, the Furies came out extremely physical and played hard from the minute the whistle blew. Keystone was more relaxed in their play and paid for it.

The teams traded try for try all match long. The Furies, with the wind advantage, scored the first try of the match which they converted, taking the lead 7-0.

Keystone wasn’t shocked or phased as they knew te potential that the Furies had to score if given the chance. Playing their style of rugby, utilizing every woman on the pitch, Keystone was able to force itself back down towards their line. A little more than halfway through the first half, flanker Allison Worman broke through the Furies defense for the unconverted try, putting Keystone on the board, 7-5.

The Furies, playing a very confident game, scored yet again in the right corner, increasing their lead to 12-5.

In keeping with the “I score, you score” theme of the day, Keystone fired back-this time taking full advantage of their forwards’ ability to dominate over their opposites. In the closing minutes of the first half, flanker Devon Boyle stole the ball off a Furies scrum and powered through the defensive line for the try. Ines Rodriguez made the conversion to tie the game, 12-12.
Keystone took advantage of the wind in the second half and sent booming kicks into Furies territory. Unfortunately, they were not able to capitalize on the field position and turne
d the ball over. It was the Furies who scored first in the second half as well, pushing their lead to 19-12.
Keystone wasn’t done yet either. Their offense took it to the Furies defensive line and was able to get into the try zone twice-only to have the ball held up both times. However, the third time was the charm as Farrah Douglas burst through for the try. The conversion was no good and Keystone still trailed 19-17.
With less than ten minutes left in the match, a beautiful kick by Rodriguez put Keystone within 5 meters of the try zone. With less than 10 minutes left in the match weighing heavily on their minds, Keystone knew it was now or never. They decided the time was now. Kim Magrini scored off the back of the scrum with less than 4 minutes remaining.

Keystone’s defense made sure that was the last score of the match and held on for the win. They’ll use the upcoming practices and weekend off to correct the issues highlighted during this close match. Next up: Keystone vs. New York on Randall’s Island on October 18.

Amazons v ORSU
By: Garrett Hoffman

The weather was cool and damp for the ORSU vs. Amazon kickoff on Sunday. The Zons started off strong with a drive that provided a nice backline attack setting up a Lynelle Kugler try at the 3:00 mark in the far corner. But three minutes later the Zons committed two key offsides penalties that put ORSU in penalty kick range putting the score 5-3 at the 6:00 mark. The ORSU team followed up the restart and put up a long stronghold within their 10 meters producing four unsuccessful Amazon drives until ORSU kicked out to the 22 which the Zons recovered. With two forward offload passes Kugler again found space and offloaded to Jenny Kruger who dished off to Colleen Tjosvold just before being tackled into touch and Tjosvold touched down for 5. The conversion kick was slotted by Nicole Benjamin putting the score at half 12-3.

The second half started out with the ref’s whistle getting involved in the penalty parade for both sides. ORSU got two quick calls setting up an Amazon penalty kick by Radtke that put the score at 15-3. Then the colors really started flying as ORSU outside center got her second not releasing yellow card which turned red and sent her off at the 47:00. In just 5 short minutes the Amazons would be down a player as the Tonnie Wulff took a ref issued time-out for ten minutes. With subs and blood subs flying off of both benches the second half was quite active and put several players out of position on both sides. ORSU’s Beckett Royce took advantage of the disorganization and made a huge 50m break through two Amazons only to give a bad pass that bounced into the hands of Rebecca Radtke who timed a perfect offload to a jet set Tjosvold who burned up the sideline for a 70 meter try at 67:00. 17-3 Amazons.

With the sense of urgency on the Zons to get one more try for that beloved bonus point and ORSU playing aggressive defense, the contact points got a bit chippy and the ref started singing his whistle and sending out yellow greeting cards again—this time the ORSU #12 got hit with the sin bin just as the Zons were pushing ORSU back. With a Amazon scrum on the five meter line the Zons put on a great offensive push—Radtke to Kugler with a well won forward ruck which set up Radtke to deliver to Kruger for a drive rucked again by forwards giving Abby Rager another beautifully clean ball to spin to Radtke yet again who dove in on the far corner just as game time expired. Final score Amazons 25 – ORSU 3.

ORSU vs Twin City Amazons
By: Angelique Jackson

The match began on even footing with the Amazons driving Or.S.U. down the field continually with their awesome rucking. Score. No kick but that is alright as the match was young. Though, for the Jesters it may have only confirmed their worries as the U.S.A. Eagle Ashley Kmiecik was not playing and San Juanita Moreno had twisted her ankle badly only the week prior. Due to Kmiecik’s absence flanker Beckett Royce had moved out of the forward line to fill-in as the fly-half.

Though their lines were fractured, the Jesters sauntered on confidently till San Juanita was given a yellow card for not rolling away. The half arrived with San Juanita in the bin and the score 12 to 3 in favor of the Amazons. Just after the break, scrumhalf Ramey Marshall was carded and San Juanita was carded for a second time after apparently again failing to roll away, officially sending her out of the match and leaving Or.S.U. at thirteen players to fifteen. Fortunately, Oregon has been scouting the local universities with some success
. Liz Kilgore, a rookie to club ball, confidently moved in to temporarily substitute as the Scrumhalf. Under her direction, the team proceeded to fight a hard battle leaving a lot of ground behind them.

The Jesters were left wondering if San Juanita Moreno will be suspended from next weeks Women’s Premier League match against the Valkyries?

Final score: Amazons 25 ORSU 3

New York vs Beantown
By: Becca Fritz

A rainy Saturday gave way to a beautiful seventy-degree Sunday; perfect Rugby weather for second match between the Red Sox and Yankees of the rugby world, Beantown and New York Women.

Like any good Beantown-New York match-up, the game moved incredibly fast and was very physical from the very first kick-off. One spectator commented that “each ruck is like a mini war”. It may have been these “wars” that caused NY to lose both their starting flyhalf and number seven, Hedwig Aerts and Phaidra Knight, respectively, to injury in the first half. It was around this time that Vaneesha McGee, New York’s number fourteen was sin-binned. With their defense weakened, Beantown scored the first try of the game. In the remaining sixty-something minutes, Town scored another two times. This being said, neither team allowed the other to stay within their half for very long. When New York made it to our try zone, “we did exactly what we said we were going to do, we didn’t let them scoring get to us. Instead, we used it to fuel the fire, it was pretty sweet to watch, actually” said one B-side player after the women from Boston beat out the ladies from The Big Apple, 19-17.

In two weeks, Beantown will host Keystone for their fourth WPL match of the season.

Roster:
1 Shannon Wallace
2 Mari Wallace
3 Sharyn Wacht
4 Jamie Burke
5 Sharon Blaney
6 Kristin Bonomo
7 Liz Terry
8 Melanie Denham
9 Kitt Wagner
10 Kelly Seary
11 Yancy Graf
12 Emilie Bydwell
13 Amy Daniels
14 Renee Astphan
15 Katie Dowty
16 Emily Jones
17 Rachael Gorab
18 Erika Mullen
19 Katy Augustyn
20 Jackie Hwang
21 Ashley Snyder
22 Jamie Howard
23 Kate Orlin

NYRC v. Beantown
By: Jillian Brooks

On a perfect fall Sunday afternoon, one made for apple picking and foliage peeping, two teams, Beantown and New York Rugby, took the pitch for what was a highly anticipated battle. Rivalry much? Yikes. Needless to say, that among the fans and Manhattan city line was a crisp intensity in the air, waiting for the right moment to set itself loose on the pitch. That moment arrived immediately with the first crushing tackle of the game.

The teams fought back and forth for the better part of the first half, nearly thirty minutes of volleying. Finally, Beantown’s Amy Daniels broke the defense to put the first points on the board. Following the Beantown try and a devastating injury to a New York player, Maura Weikman entered the game to kick for points putting the score at 3-5. Quickly after the field goal, Vanesha McGee added a try to the New York side, and Weikman again knocked in field goal. With New York up at half, 10-5, both teams set to the sidelines to hydrate, discuss strategy, and adjust to injuries.

The second half was under way quickly with Yancy Graf of Beantown scoring to tie up the game, and Ashley Snyder nailing in a deep kick to put Beantown up, 10-12. It seemed before those points were even tallied on the score sheets, New York’s Jenna Flateman responded with a try of her own. Weikman knocking in another conversion, New York was up 17-12 early in the second half. Another quick response try came from Beantown’s Emily Jones, with conversion from Ashley Snyder. Beantown found themselves on top on the scoreboard once again, and that’s where they would remain for the following twenty minutes of the game.

In addition to the players, the trainer’s seemed to get quite a workout of their own. Both teams having several key players leave the game prematurely. To say this match up was entertaining to watch would be an understatement. It was brilliant rugby. New York is set to match up against Keystone in two weeks time, a game that proves to be as intense as this one.

Point Totals:

Beanttown
Amy Daniels
Yancy Graf
Emily Jones
Ashley Snyder (2 – conversions)

NYRC
Vanesha McGee
Jenna Flateman
Maura Weikman (2 conversions, 1 PT)

Valkyries vs Berkeley
By: Phoebe Boone

The All Blues played their toughest match of the season on Sunday against a revamped Valkyries side. With flyhalf Steph Bruce out and wing Nathalie Marchino moving to outside center, they were a bit curious to see if the success they’ve had so far this season would continue. But the changes in their back line did little to slow the All Blues attack. Ruth Bryson did a superb job at flyhalf and her defensive pressure was crucial to the All Blues success. The first 23 minutes of the match were nail biting as both teams attacked and defended incredibly well, both pushing for tries. But Bryson found space out wide in the 23rd and 25th minutes and tries were scored by outside center Nat Marchino and wing Vix Folayan after recovering Bryson’s kicks over the Valkyrie wings.

But the Valkyries weren’t going to let the All Blues have the the match. Valkyrie flyhalf Hannah Stolba crossed the line in the 31st minute and converted her own try, making the score 10-7. Two more tries were traded before half: one from All Blues inside center Kelly Griffin who found a hole in the center and sped her way into the try zone, and one by Valkyries winger Tracy Call out wide. Score at half was 17-12 (the closest half time score the All Blues have seen all season).

But the All Blues found their rhythm after the restart and the entire team was rejuvenated when the forward pack walked a scrum into the try zone for 8-man Blair Groefsema to touch the ball down. Stolba found her way across the line again in the 49th minute, making the score 24-17. But the All Blues didn’t give up and posted two more tries before the game was through. Marchino saw her second try in the 58th minute and Folayan completed her set after fullbacvk Ashley English broke through the line, offloaded to Griffin and Folayan picked the ball and ran up the sideline to score.

Final score: 34-17. More photos from the match can be found here.


Discover more from YSCRugby | Women's Rugby News

Subscribe to get the latest posts to your email.

15 thoughts on “WPL Week 4 Match Reports”

  1. Did Ms. Jackson just blame the ref for this loss?

    Every one of us has been in a match colored by a referee, but to shamelessly blame the referee for the ORSU loss is a bit harsh. Why did your team not simply adjust? The Amazon's seemed to own up to their penalties – top clubs learn to adjust. The referees for the WPL matches are all assigned by USA Rugby and are B panel refs. Maybe it's the players that need to do the adjusting …

    Was the refereeing in Minnesota also to blame for ORSU's previous losses?

    Reply
  2. Did she, the aforementioned Ms. Jackson, speak on behalf of the Amazons when she expressed how "cheap" this win was for them? I find it hard to believe that a team who won at this level, or any level for that matter, would say they only won because of the referee and his/her calls? For the sake of Ms. Jackson and her statments, I hope she has cleared her comments about the validity of the Zons win before she downplayed and down right excused it as nothing more as a win handed to them by the referee, not a display of thier skill and talent.

    Reply
  3. Thank you for your comments, I have spoke with Angelique and have reminded her that even though the match may have been intense, match reports need to remain appropriate.

    Thank you,
    Wendy

    Reply
  4. Is Juanita out now? Two yellows = red … how many weeks are left in competition? Typically isn't a red card out for 2 weeks or 3 games or something like that?

    Anyone know what the WPL rules are for red cards?

    Reply
  5. I must explain my article. I feel that I did not clarify my point properly. It was NOT> my intention to imply that the Amazon's victory was cheap (I had said "cheapened")nor that the referee's calls were the only foundation for their success in Oregon or in Minnesota. My stance was that despite the obvious lead made by the Zons and their immaculate play, the referee's bad call took away from their spotlight as victors. Though the first card called against player San Juanita Moreno is arguably valid she had exuded incredible efforts to display she was trying to avoid the penalty the second time. I maintain that the referee made calls that were biased. Twin Cities played an awesome 80 min of rugby.

    My article was intended to show that the referee arbitrarily made himself the 31st man on the field and to raise the issue of call consequences. I say arbitrarily because on several accounts the calls were not based in truth and frankly, the Amazons did not need an advantage— their match skills speak for themselves.

    As the sport of rugby is becoming more and more popular here in the U.S. and is gaining recognition internationally it is our obligation to maintain professionalism. Each call made will matter more and more. Each consequence paid will be more and more severe. No, I do not blame the referee for the loss by ORSU nor do I feel that the Amazons won only because of these calls. I feel that Moreno did not deserve the second yellow card, that the Amazons won due to their superior rugby playing, and that the calls made by referees should be monitored more closely.

    Reply
  6. Angelique,

    I am outraged with your comments. Not only was your initial match report out of line, but you have followed it up by stating that the referee made "bad calls", and accuse him of being biased.

    Firstly, regarding his "bad calls", would you like to back up your comments with some kind of evidence, and place your comments within the context of the laws of the game? If you are going to make such comments can we assume that you have some refereeing experience? To be so sure of those comments one has to assume that you are a referee of a greater standing than those that you are criticizing.

    Secondly, by accusing him of bias you are accusing him of cheating. What gives you the right to accuse a nationally ranked referee of cheating?

    Reply
  7. Maybe it would've been smart to take Moreno out of the game after the first card to avoid the risk of a red card. Just a thought.

    Reply
  8. Dear Biffer,

    I appreciate that you have followed up the discretionary editing of my article with your comment but I really must refute it. I do not have referee experience. I am a player however, and I can not begin to tell you the number of times commands like "Number thirteen roll out of the ruck, please" have been yelled at me. This is the call the referee made prior to yellow-carding San Juanita. I have never been carded for it, much less twice in a single match. Loitering in the ruck is definitely a hindrance to the progress of a match and should be discouraged. Especially when considering that the referee had already established presidence as an advantage judge. Once you are not a part of a ruck, by law, you are required to retire and/or rejoin on-sides. Referees are required to report a penalty for continuous violations of laws by a player especially when they have been warned. The issue with this call is that San Juanita was trapped at the bottom of a fallen ruck where she held her hands above her head calling out to the referee "Sir, I am trying to roll out." and "Sir, I am still stuck." I feel so adamant about this issue, not because I am a fan of Oregon Sports Union— because I am not— but instead due to the consequences she will pay despite having learned her lesson the first time she was pulled out of that match.Standing on the sidelines hearing that penalty called was shocking. I do not think that this referee is under qualified. I feel that the call was bad. What about the player sitting on top of San Juanita? Why was she not penalized? It is within my scope of understanding to feel that this call was a mistake. To say that this was cheating is not for me to say or even to imply. I realized after review of my article that is my haste I had made this implication. Again, I will apologize to all parties involved.

    Angelique

    Reply
  9. Angelique,

    I appreciate your response, and that you acknowledge that you are not a referee and that the referee is qualified to handle that match. I agree, I know him and he is more than qualified, hence my outrage at the tone of some of your comments.

    Now you've got down to some specifics, I think we can work on this a little more constructively.

    I see that you've commented that San Juanita was trapped, and holding her arms above her head attempting to highlight this fact. There are two issues in play with this:

    1) Frequently a player will attempt to bluff the referee with claims of being trapped, arms above the head pleading innocence. As was recently highlighted with South African player Bismark DuPlessis, a referee is often capable of distinguishing when a real effort has been made.

    2) A player may sometimes be trapped at the ruck phase, however the infringement may stem back from the tackle phase, or perhaps earlier in the ruck phase, where a player lingers just long enough to allow themself to become trapped.

    As a rugby player yourself I hope that distinctions like this are items that you would want to consider. Out of interest, prior to writing your report did you approach the referee to ask him about his interpretation at those critical phases? I know him, and he's a very approachable guy.

    I don't want this to become an attack on you, I and other readers appreciate that you are working with Wendy to provide coverage of these matches, but by the same token I and others will feel the need to hold you accountable.

    Reply
  10. It's important to realize, no matter whether the player in question was bluffing or not, at this level players are quite capable of committing professional penalties. As many a flanker or ball hungry prop knows, occasionally a ref simply thinks every time you have a fare take that it is hands in. At that point you have to adjust, whether the ref is right or wrong. Sometimes that means pulling back from activities that could help your team.

    I have been yellow carded for being that unlucky last person to commit the same infraction. I was literally arm crawling out of the bottom of a ruck. It didn't matter, it was at NASCs, with a national panel ref and the expectations were clear. After my 10 minute break I adjusted how I was playing at the breakdown to avoid ending my weekend early.

    Play to the ref and use other tools if necessary!

    Reply
  11. For the record, the writer of the match report does not play for ORSU – that is a silly assumption on some commenters' parts. I do play for ORSU, and our team is not blaming the referee for our loss.

    However, it is silly to say that no one should ever be able to criticize a referee's style. Players must adjust to a ref if they hope for an effective match; however people can have valid disagreements with his or her methods of controlling the match. Refereeing rugby is an art more than a science, and there are many different ways of enforcing the laws that are all "correct". And, even the best referees make mistakes sometimes – that's just the nature of rugby.

    This referee went to his pocket quicker than many do. Angelique felt that was a detriment to the contest – that is her perfectly valid opinion. She also actually watched the game in person, while I'd bet that most commenters here haven't even watched the video – because it hasn't been posted online yet. So debate the difference of opinion with her if you want – after you watch the match – and quit with the condescending personal attacks.

    Wendy, I also respectfully disagree with your decision to edit what she wrote. Perhaps you would like less editorial in the match report in the future, but taking it out after the fact feels like censorship.

    Reply
  12. Biffer, since you brought up DuPlessis – I can't resist pointing out that at the international level, even non-technical infractions (such as punching) are often handled adeptly by referees by a talking to and a penalty. Remember the massive punch up at the end of the final Lions v S Africa match this summer? Both teams were into it, people running in, fists flying, wrestling… the result: a good talking to, some calming down, and then… a penalty. Not a yellow in sight.

    International-level referees are generally excellent at gauging how heavy a touch is needed to keep authority over a match without changing the essential contest.

    Reply
  13. Anna,

    Firstly, it's great to have someone who played in the match appear on the thread.

    Secondly, the outrage about Angelique's comments were less a case of people disliking the fact that she disagreed with the referee, and more a case that she was claiming that his decisions were incorrect. As the law 10.3.a states, repeated infringements are a matter of fact, the question of whether there was an intent to infringe is irrelevant.

    It's worth bearing in mind that the players will have seen a broad spectrum of referees outside of the WPL, but the agreement with USA Rugby was that the league would be refereed entirely by National Panel and National Focus Group referees. Perhaps the strict standards of these referees were an unexpected result?

    Reply
  14. Hi Biffer,

    I don't think it's a question of not being accustomed to high-level referees. This was our fourth match of the WPL season, and we didn't have any penalty trouble in the prior three, which were all officiated by National Panel and National Focus Group referees as you noted. Also, ORSU has been to nationals the past three years and had high-level officials for our matches there, including this same referee.

    I think the frustration stems from the manner in which cards were applied between teams. As you stated, repeated infringements are a matter of fact, whether or not there was an intent to infringe. However, both teams had repeated penalties – in fact the penalty count was virtually identical, with the Amazons incurring 12 and ORSU 13. Each team had 6 penalties at the half. It was very even – yet ORSU received 4 yellows cards (and an automatic red for Juanita's two yellows in one match), and the Amazons received 1 yellow.

    I realize that there are other factors that influence cards, such as the type of offenses and who committed them. All of the offenses for both teams were non-violent technical infringements.

    When ORSU received the first yellow card of the match, it was on our fourth penalty; the Amazons also already had 4. They then received two more penalties, and received a talking-to but no card.

    Juanita received a second yellow for infringing again after her first yellow. The Amazons #2 also received a yellow card in the second half for repeated infringement; then later in the half committed another infringement, but was not given a second yellow.

    Finally, the other two yellows were given to ORSU players on their first infringements, one of which was a player who was in an offside position but was not involved in the play, and retreated when she heard the Referee tell her she was offside.

    It is up to the referee to give cards as he sees fit according to the laws; but I think some players and spectators felt that the punishment was lopsided given the even penalty count and the identical patterns of infringement between teams.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.